Using peak name in a CF

I am trying to sort certain results using the peak name in my CF in order to obtain the sum of those peaks.  These peaks are named using RRT.    

I tried with a Peak, Real, Calculated.  
EQ(Name,RRT*)*CF

All or nothing is checked, but still having an error message saying RRT is either a field name which does not exist or a key word that need to be used in its exact format.  According to a few post in this forum, should be able to sort using this type of syntaxe.

Any idea?

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Answers

  • Peak names are an intrinsic data type of text, so when quoting them in a CF formula, the full name is required and they need to be referenced in inverted commas eg "Aspirin" and not "Aspiri?" or "Asp*". The two Wildcards of * and ? are now allowed when referencing peak names. Unlike a report method Data Filtering Condition which does allow these symbols. 

    If wanting to sum the areas/amounts etc of the RRT* peaks in a chromatogram, you could set up a Result, Real CF. Set up a group peak which contains all the RRT peaks and reference this Named Group in the formula eg SUM(Group[Area]).
  • Thanks!  Was missing the " "
  • Hello
    RRT is a numerical value and peak name is a text string so that 2 do not match.  RRT~ is the prefix to the peaks named RRT with a number that follows.  Peak Name is a text field so you need to put quotation marks around the peak name.  I hope that helps.
    Kind Regards, Neil  
  • Summing unknowns is WAY easier to do by filtering a report method table... No CF needed.
  • shaunwat
    edited October 2020
    .... or if for what ever reason you heart is set on a CF for what ever reason, then don't name the unknown peaks and:

    1. Test_CF, Boolean: EQ(Peak Type, Unknown) translation: 0=1, 1=0

    2. Unknown_Sum: Test_CF*area % [or what ever peak parameter you would like to sum).

    Unknown_Total: Sum(Unknown_Sum)
  • Hi - you need to put Unknown in quotes and flip the order in the translation table the other way.  I've tested this and it works.  Please see the screen capture below:

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.