CF Impurity % in a Sample
Being very novice in Empower usage, a step-by step response will be please very helpful and very much appreciated.
I am creating a Custom Field to calculate the Impurity C % of a compound in the injection of a Sample, by means of the following formula:
The Sample Set of the sequence is the following:
The CF I created is the following (see line 6):
The processing method is:
However, my CF didn't work: in particular, when I open the sequence in Review (without processing) I only obtain empty cells. Unfortunately, I was not able to find mistakes.
Thanks in advace for any help,
Kind regards,
Fabio
Comments
-
Dear Fabio,
The reason your custom field does not work is probably because you use intersample custom field references. D…(Value) or D..(CCompRef1[Area]
That will only work if you process the sample set in a whole to obtain a result set with the summarize custom field row at the end of your sequence.
As the calculation is a pretty straight forward calculation I think what you should do is the following.
- Remove in your Component Editor the 1.0000 from all your unknowns and standards. Only use the actual values. Leave the rest blank.
- I interpretate your sampleweight 10.1380 and dilution 5000 to be the actual sample weight and the times it is diluted. Leave it as it is.
- Create a custom field calculation Amount/CConst1*100
- If you look in review now, it should work if you first calibrate your standards and integrate your samples afterwards.
A calibration curve for your impurity C will be drawn up and the amount will be calculated against it.
Amount is calculated with the default fields and you could interpretate it as Area(sample)/Area(ref)*Value(ref)*Purity(ref %)/Sampleweight(Sample)*Dilution(sample)
So you can start from Amount and incorporate the formula further from that.
Off course there are a lot of different ways to go with this but in my opinion, this is a pretty easy approach to it.
1 -
Dear Jovvor,
I modified the CFs as you reported. I have added the summarize custom field row at the end of sequence. Now it all makes sense!
thank you so much,
Fabio0